Dear Vamsi, Both ways are perfectly fine, it all depends on the AUT. We have one more property "Re-usability" need to keep into consideration while deciding which approach to use. As for example in my case, I worked on a project in which more than 80 similar web applications need to be tested, for all these web applications UI were similar, but object properties were different, so now in this scenario to load and unload of ORs would have taken much time so instead of doing that we stored the object descriptions in the database.
Regards, Manoj On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:05 AM, vamsi reddy <[email protected]> wrote: > *Hi All,* > * I faced a question in the interview* > * Which one is best Descriptive programming or Object Repository?* > * > * > * As of my knowledge:* > * 1.It depends on the Application functionality and complexity to identify > the Object.* > * 2.If the object description modifies,we have to update in xls(for > Descriptive program) or in OR.* > * 3.Object Repository- To identify the object it takes more time.* > > * Need some more clarity about this* > * Thanks in Advance...* > -- > Vamsi Reddy > *09618272979* > > * * > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" > group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en
