*@Ganesh: *Dear Ganesh,
1. Can you please tell how does our discussion affecting the group and can affect the group. This is something strange which I have seen for the first time on any group. 2. I hope we are not violating any rule of the forum with our discussion. If so then kindly let us know 3. As far as relevance of QTP is concerned with the discussion then, it is 100% relevant with the forum that could be helpful to any member of the group since various code snippets for various topics on the discussion could be shared in between communication. Members can directly make use of the same discussion whenever required on that topic instead of asking the same thing again personally to that person as it could be possible that at that point of time person may not be available for help other group members. 4. Lastly, Offline communication is only preferred when one got a doubt which is extremely irrelevant to the group or one feels complex or uncomfortable asking @ group.* *If you still believe that it is affecting the group than I personally take care of these things in future. * Also I would request all group members to provide their valuable inputs and thoughts on the above points and let me know if anybody feels in same direction as our dear moderator... :) and anybody else also have any problem with such type of discussions. *Please let me know if you have any other concerns or feel free write to me @ *[email protected]* Regards Shalabh Dixit On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:43 PM, sanjeevi ravikumar <[email protected] > wrote: > Dear Moderator, > > Thanks for allowing to post my doubt. > I am fine with that :) > But now a days there is scope coming for automation > for ETL testing toooo > > Regards, > Sanjeevi > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Ganesh muralidharan <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Sanjeevi and Shalabh, >> >> Please take this communication offline. I dont think this discussion >> relates to the QTP group. I allowed the initial mail to flow in so that >> other members in the team be aware that we have experts in this area with us >> whom we can ask for assistance. >> >> I dont feel the entire group needs to be looped in during your further >> discussions. >> >> Moderator. >> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:38 PM, sanjeevi ravikumar < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Shalabh Dixit, >>> >>> Thank you for responding, >>> Can you please explain in detail by step by step >>> how you data validation from starting source to target. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Sanjeevi >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Shalabh Dixit < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm working on similar assignment involving XML validation with Flat >>>> files which are getting converted into views using a Grid Tool Datamaker. >>>> We >>>> need to run the Shell scripts through putty which generates different >>>> number >>>> of XML files. >>>> Also we need to validate the records count from two different tables for >>>> which I'm preparing the count queries dynamically. >>>> >>>> Everything is non-UI based except putty window... :) >>>> >>>> Let me know if you need any kind of help. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Shalabh Dixit >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:04 AM, sanjeevi ravikumar < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> *Hi Ben,* >>>>> >>>>> * * >>>>> >>>>> *Thanks for responding.* >>>>> >>>>> *I am looking for high-level understanding of ETL testing using >>>>> informatica* >>>>> >>>>> *with combination of multiple source systems like Flat files, oracle >>>>> and Teradata * >>>>> >>>>> *and targets as Flat files, Teradata and XML.* >>>>> >>>>> *My expected ETL will be working on Unix OS. * >>>>> >>>>> * * >>>>> >>>>> *More specific to the process that we follow in step by step like our >>>>> normal testing >>>>> approaches and any special kind of validation/verification that we >>>>> perform with respective ETL like record count ect * >>>>> >>>>> * * >>>>> >>>>> *Sample test plan/ sample test case for ETL testing * >>>>> >>>>> * * >>>>> >>>>> *Regards,* >>>>> >>>>> *Sanjeevi* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Sully >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sanjeevi >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you be more specific about what the behaviour you are trying to >>>>>> verify? Multiple source systems? Multiple target systems? Types of >>>>>> endpoints? Databases? If so what kind - Oracle, MySQL? Flat files? >>>>>> What ETL engine constitutes your test subject? Pentaho? IBM >>>>>> DataStage? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Ben >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 17, 11:24 pm, sanjeevi ravikumar <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Hi All >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I am looking for some helping hand to know about ETL testing >>>>>> > like process followed in ETL testing, Phases in ETL testing >>>>>> > and sample test cases, Test process/management documents. >>>>>> > Or any helping sites regarding Prefect ETL testing. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>> > Ravikumar >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" >>>>>> group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" >>>>> group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" >>>> group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected] >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" >>> group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" >> group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" > group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en
