Hey Kevin, you are the next Einstein of Mathematics ! But have you ever thought about what you have said ? You are saying that theorems and axioms (which build everthing in maths) can change for big numbers. But why should that be so ? They have a general validity ! I agree with you that not all qualities of numbers are discovered. That knows everyone who has some knowledge in mathematics. But the problem of physics is that when you do a messure there are always some errors in it. And in the distrbution of such errors every exorbitant theory has a place in it. And if Newton or doesn`t matter which scientist would have precise instruments he/she would write another theories. But don`t forget: MATHEMATICS IS EXACT !!! If we would use the binary system for counting since our first day a child could count up to 1023 and then see much more of the world. I get angry when some people attack some 100% logic things like the maths isn`t absolut (e.g. 1+1=3 is in an other galaxy) or predicts from Nostradamus say that an asian mathematik expert (nothing agaings them) discoveres in 22xx that PI was calculated false. B...sh.. ! Your problem -and there you aren`t alone- is that they mix aequivalences <=> with implications -> or think that implications can be tourned in the other way. It`s nice that you think about correctness of proofs, but be very careful with that what you say. I know that was hard. But life is also hard. greetings Bojan
