George Woltman wrote: > The optimal breakeven point for factoring vs. LL testing > changes every time the factoring code or LL code changes. > In the old days, the breakeven point was 2^56, now its 2^57. Does that take into account the fact that a factor found does not require time to check, whereas a LL residue needs to be computed twice? YotN, Henk. factoring rules!
- Mersenne: Question about double checking al
- Re: Mersenne: Question about double checking George Woltman
- Re: Mersenne: Question about double checking Henk Stokhorst
- Re: Mersenne: Question about double checking Brian J Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: Question about double check... Henk Stokhorst
- Re: Mersenne: Question about double checking Timothy Graham
