OK, I've seen several people state this, and I feel that it needs to be
corrected.
>woensdag 16 september 1998 15:54 "Dean-Christian Strik"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
>|Aaron got his results illegally,
>
>This is under contention currently. It's a charge or an allegation, not
>an established legal fact or conclusion. Aaron is supposed to be presumed
>innocent unless/until proven guilty.
'Presumed Innocent' actually applies only to _criminal_ proceedings. Civil
cases hold both parties to a neutral standard and non-legal areas are free
to presume whatever they like.
Now, having said that, I see no reason for anyone to delete the checks
already done. The information is perfectly valid.
--
John Dilick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
