all,
>I don't quite see how this makes it unneccessary to check only iteration
>numbers which are powers of 2. How long does it take to find a cycle
>length of, say, 127 if you're sampling only powers of 2?

I wasn't saying that we should keep the checking only in powers of 2, 
I was just using powers of 2 as nice big round numbers (I usually use these
rather than multiples of 10.)
-Lucas 
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm

Reply via email to