Stephen Whitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He claimed to be a programmer, but then over and over he claimed that > bugs should *always* be caught in testing, prior to release. That > proves he's lying, because no programmer can believe that happens in > the real world. A complete set of test-cases should catch all major (e.g. showstopper) bugs. If a bug of such magnitude makes it into a release product testing cannot have been thorough. And someone admitted that testing for v.17 was in fact not thorough, as the routines that kick in above 2^22 never were tested since the test suite didn't include an exponent above 2^22. > Maybe we'll get lucky and his ISP will screw him again... :^) You should grow like a turnip, with your head in the ground and your legs in the air. ____________________________________________________________________ Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 ________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
