At 08:57 AM 7/12/99 +0200, you wrote: > The law of leading digits predicts that, for decimal numbers, >log10(2) ~= 30.1% will have leading digit 1. Uh, won't they *ALL* have a leading digit of one? Anything with a leading digit of ZERO can be totally discounted.... ________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
- Re: Mersenne: re: Mersenne prime exponent bin... Peter-Lawrence . Montgomery
- Re: Mersenne: re: Mersenne prime exponen... Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: re: Mersenne prime exponen... Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: re: Mersenne prime exp... Chip Lynch
- Re: Mersenne: re: Mersenne prime... Jud McCranie
- RE: Mersenne: re: Mersenne pr... Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy
- Re: Mersenne: re: Mersenne p... Henrik Olsen
