I understand that the differences between the GIMPS and the Primenet
standings are an artefact of how GIMPS was up and running before Primenet.
Consequently, anyone that joined and finished numbers before Primenet was
running will have different totals on each list.
My question is whether this logic has changed at all. The August 16th GIMPS
update shows me with 13.39 years and 125 exponents tested and I was
surprised to see that Tuesday's update shows 12.58 years and 127 exponents!
Perhaps this question should be for George, but I thought that maybe I
missed a message about a change or something.
Any comment is welcome.
Rick.
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alienshore.com/
_________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
