On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Spike Jones wrote:
> Aaron, its *because* of your experience that I am going the
> slow legal way. {8-] Otherwise I mighta just sent out GIMPS
> as an enclosure and thought little of it. I never did really get much
> management attention until I pointed out that a clever programmer
> could *already be using* spare CPU cycles on our machines and
> we wouldnt even know it, unless we had our own, well controlled
> background process to keep tabs on that.
It might be a nice idea to start documenting everything that has helped
people pass gimps through bureaucracy, and collecting it on the gimps web
page. I've considered trying to get it approved at the last couple
companies I was at, and the one I'm currently at. Any suggestions, and
especially success stories, would be a great encouragement.
__________________________________________________________________
PGP fingerprint = 03 5B 9B A0 16 33 91 2F A5 77 BC EE 43 71 98 D4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.op.net/~darxus
Chaos reigns.
_________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
