>From: "Frank_A_L_I_N_Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Stefan Struiker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: "James Escamilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News >Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:23:34 -0500 > >what aobut the fact that our tests will take longer and longer as the >exponents get larger > >Frank I believe that Moore's Law will more than make up for that, unless huge numbers of machines start joining GIMPS. Regards, Nathan ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Jeff Woods
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Stefan Struiker
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Frank_A_L_I_N_Y
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Stefan Struiker
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Stefan Struiker
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Lucas Wiman
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Nathan Russell
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Pierre Abbat
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News kilfoyle
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Rick Pali
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Tzepish
- Mersenne: [OFF TOPIC] Stadiums Fred W. Helenius
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News Nathan Russell
