|
Hello all,
I have been lurking on this mailing list for a
while now and wish to comment on a suggestion that was made a while back.
Someone said that maybe a sizeable portion of the GIMPS participants were
Seti@Home dropouts and regardless of it's questionable chance of
success, that project is contributing greatly to the development of
distributed computing on the internet.
I agree with this.
Personally, I first joined S@H because it was the only distributed project I was
aware of and I found that very concept (distributed computing) very
appealing. Since then, I have switched to GIMPS for several
reasons.
1- It is easy to use: no need for manual
communication like some of the more obscure mathematical problems.
2- I found the work worthwhile compared to
searching for an impropable Alien radio signal or doing brainless code
cracking which has no real scientific value.
3- Perphaps most important of all, the Seti servers
are always having problems because there is so much interest in the project
(leading me to believe that my work is superfluous). Furthermore, the
program used is badly unoptimised (the Olli patch made quite a scandal)
and it could be optimised very easily (replace the FFT routine). This
is further proof that my time there was not really needed.
For some reason, I have considered the decision of
choosing which other project to join to be an important one (even though I
only have a Pentium 200). I might however switch to www.processtree.com (my
partner # is 5766 for those interested) which plans on paying people for
their computer's time (very appealing) or Cosm (cosm.mthral.org) which are
going to do lots of things and seem to me very organised. It's creator helped
launch ditributed.net.
On another note, I want to
convince my University faculty (Science) to run Prime 95 in the computer
labs. How can I prove that the client will not affect the performance of
the computers; even the old Pentium 60ish. I'm not sure if I believe that
myself. And at what speed do computers start being automatically assigned
factoring assignments. Do you have suggestions on how to accomplish
this? I've already spoken to a technician but he wasn't very collaborative,
saying that all sorts of permissions were needed but I haven't given up
yet.
Francois LeBlanc
|
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS and other distributed projects Francois LeBlanc
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS and other distributed projects Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS and other distributed projects Siegmar Szlavik
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS and other distributed projec... Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS and other distributed projects Siegmar Szlavik
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS and other distributed projec... Brian J. Beesley
