On 17 Feb 2001, at 20:06, Nathan Russell wrote:
> This reminded me of a discussion I had with a friend.
>
> "Ever looked into Prime95?"
[... snip ...]
> "I thought Prime95 was just for overclocking and stuff."
>
> Frankly, it upsets me when I read a magazine article that mentions
> Prime95 solely in the context of testing recently OCed machines.
I know what you mean ... but the fact is there's no such thing as
_bad_ publicity.
However I do wonder how much of the recycling of expired exponents is
due to people picking up Prime95 just to run a hardware test. The
proportion of LL test assignments which complete seems to be dropping
recently. I wonder if there is some problem where the program goes &
picks up an assignment straight away on installation - would it be
too much of a deterrent to normal users if it asked a straightforward
question "Do you want to run a full self-test?" before anything else,
& if so leave the setup of PrimeNet username etc. till later?
BTW I think it's a Darned Good Idea (tm) to run a full selftest on
_any_ new system, and indeed periodically (say every year) on any
system which is in continuing use, whether or not it's overclocked.
Regards
Brian Beesley
_________________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
