This has probably already been posted to the list by others, but as I get it in digest form, I can't say for sure.) http://slashdot.org/articles/01/03/17/1639250.shtml The numberin question is a 1401-digit probable prime. I've asked Phil Carmody whether it's been rigorously proven prime, or merely passed a strong probable-prime test. -Ernst _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? EWMAYER
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Michael Gebis
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? David L. Nicol
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Jean Flinois
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: First illegal prime? Nathan Russell
