On Saturday 31 March 2001 03:09, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2001, at 15:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> > processes are running. However, under Solaris, something
> > run at priority 19 still tends to get a
> > not-insignificant share of CPU time - a typical number
> > is 15% on a system with one other full-priority job
> > running.
>
> I sort of didn't really believe this until I checked it. But you're
> right!

Under Linux, it is only slightly better.  (note, however, that the 'other' 
job is not a particularly kind one in CPU terms!)

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
 5528 nathan    14   0   464  464   376 R    85.0  0.3   2:47 yes
  200 nathan    19  19 11720  11M   336 R N   5.3  8.9  1436m mprime
 4126 root       0   0 32860  32M  2180 S     4.9 25.1   4:11 X
 5467 nathan     0   0 14452  14M 10572 S     3.0 11.0   0:08 kmail
 4262 nathan     0   0  9552 9552  7888 S     0.4  7.3   0:17 kdeinit
 4488 nathan     0   0  4524 4524  3440 S     0.3  3.4   0:28 gaim
 4277 nathan     0   0  7140 7140  6360 S     0.2  5.4   0:13 kdeinit
 5514 nathan     1   0   920  920   696 R     0.2  0.7   0:00 top

> > This has caused me to have to restrict my GIMPS
> > work to only our least-used (read: slowest) Sparcs,
> > since people running actual work-related jobs don't
> > want to be slowed down by a recreational-math program.
>
> Sensible attitude ... doesn't bother me much on the two Solaris
> systems I have access to, since the other jobs running tend to be I/O
> bound rather than compute bound.

I wish the admins here would allow distributed computing - they say that 
whenever the machine is slow they were getting flames about the distributed 
client 'raising the load average'.  

(big snip)

> I think the load average limit for starting the process should be
> about one half less than the number of processors - say 0.5 on a
> uniprocessor system - and the load average limit for stopping it
> should be a little less than one more than the number of processors -
> say 1.8 on a uniprocessor system.

I don't know much about such things, but I would note that I was working 
quite comfortably during the above test with load averages in the 2.3 range.  
However, the typical 'uniprocessor system' is not a P3 with a single user 
typing email!  

> Regards
> Brian Beesley

Nathan
_________________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

Reply via email to