Nathan Russell wrote:
http://www.half-empty.org/servlet/LoadPage?pageID=idea&ideaid=1644&sortmode=3&viewmode=3

I thought the prime community might want to stop by and take a look at
what's been said.

Nathan I liked your comment about the largest genuine composite:
a number known to be composite but for which none of the factors
are known.  I suppose we could set up a computer to arbitrarily
generate a few million 20 digit primes by factoring, then multiply
them all together to get the largest known composite number for
which none of the factors would be "known", eh?  spike

Reply via email to