At 08:14 PM 5/12/2001 +0000, Brian J. Beesley wrote: rather small, so the reason a third or fourth run is neccessary is >very probably because results with mismatching residuals are being >submitted for some reason. Most probably random glitches? Another nice thing would be if people who have submitted several results that don't match other people's results they could be notified that they may have a hardware problem. +------------------------------------+ | Jud McCranie | | | | former temporary part-time adjunct | | instructor of a minor university | +------------------------------------+ _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Martijn Kruithof
- Mersenne: Re: 26 exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? mohk
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Chris Jefferson
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? George Woltman
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Chris Jefferson
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Daran
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Mersenne: Differences betwixt NTPrime and Prime95 Aaron Blosser