John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >the numerologists are at it again... > >http://www.nature.com/nsu/030317/030317-13.html >
I wonder if they tried checking it against the "Lucky Numbers" (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LuckyNumber.html)?? Also, wasn't there someone who did some analysis on a list of numbers generated by using random numbers and the 1/ln(n) probability function? I wonder if the "numerologists" would have written the same paper using this list as well? -Shaun _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
