Module: Mesa
Branch: 7.11
Commit: 6c1a9a327d031cd46680f28de8636b9335847650
URL:    
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=6c1a9a327d031cd46680f28de8636b9335847650

Author: Tobias Droste <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Jul 18 07:14:06 2011 +0200

r300/compiler: simplify code in peephole_add_presub_add

Signed-off-by: Tobias Droste <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 84f8548dfcc7de55e162359e2e39af2614903cbe)

---

 .../drivers/dri/r300/compiler/radeon_optimize.c    |   35 ++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/radeon_optimize.c 
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/radeon_optimize.c
index b242742..39dcb21 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/radeon_optimize.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/radeon_optimize.c
@@ -561,28 +561,29 @@ static int peephole_add_presub_add(
        struct rc_instruction * inst_add)
 {
        unsigned dstmask = inst_add->U.I.DstReg.WriteMask;
-       struct rc_src_register * src1 = NULL;
-       unsigned int i;
-
-       if (!is_presub_candidate(c, inst_add))
-               return 0;
+        unsigned src0_neg = inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Negate & dstmask;
+        unsigned src1_neg = inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Negate & dstmask;
 
        if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Swizzle != inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Swizzle)
                return 0;
 
-       /* XXX This isn't fully implemented, is it? */
-       /*   src0 and src1 can't have absolute values only one can be negative 
and they must be all negative or all positive. */
-       for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-               if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[i].Abs)
-                       return 0;
+       /* src0 and src1 can't have absolute values */
+       if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Abs || inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Abs)
+               return 0;
 
-               /* XXX This looks weird, but it's basically what was here 
before this commit (see git blame): */
-               if ((inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[i].Negate & dstmask) != dstmask && 
!src1) {
-                       src1 = &inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[i];
-               }
-       }
+       /* presub_replace_add() assumes only one is negative */
+       if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Negate && inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Negate)
+               return 0;
+
+        /* if src0 is negative, at least all bits of dstmask have to be set */
+        if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Negate && src0_neg != dstmask)
+               return 0;
 
-       if (!src1)
+        /* if src1 is negative, at least all bits of dstmask have to be set */
+        if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Negate && src1_neg != dstmask)
+               return 0;
+
+       if (!is_presub_candidate(c, inst_add))
                return 0;
 
        if (presub_helper(c, inst_add, RC_PRESUB_ADD, presub_replace_add)) {
@@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static void presub_replace_inv(
  * of the add instruction must have the constatnt 1 swizzle.  This function
  * does not check const registers to see if their value is 1.0, so it should
  * be called after the constant_folding optimization.
- * @return 
+ * @return
  *     0 if the ADD instruction is still part of the program.
  *     1 if the ADD instruction is no longer part of the program.
  */

_______________________________________________
mesa-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-commit

Reply via email to