Module: Mesa
Branch: 10.2
Commit: 18336b99b2c8d71569bdb89a6c3cb93880cd3fc3
URL:    
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=18336b99b2c8d71569bdb89a6c3cb93880cd3fc3

Author: Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Sep 24 21:45:07 2014 -0400

nv50/ir: avoid deleting pseudo instructions too early

What happens is that a SPLIT operation is part of the spill node, and as
a pseudo op, the instruction gets erased after processing its first def.
However the later defs still need to refer to it, so instead delay
deleting until after that whole RA node is done processing.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79462
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]>
Cc: "10.2 10.3" <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0147c10c5f00b43696ba660aab604d674a75e83c)

---

 src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ra.cpp |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ra.cpp 
b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ra.cpp
index f2a8b55..814e353 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ra.cpp
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ra.cpp
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 
 #include <stack>
 #include <limits>
+#include <tr1/unordered_set>
 
 namespace nv50_ir {
 
@@ -1544,6 +1545,11 @@ SpillCodeInserter::run(const std::list<ValuePair>& lst)
       LValue *lval = it->first->asLValue();
       Symbol *mem = it->second ? it->second->asSym() : NULL;
 
+      // Keep track of which instructions to delete later. Deleting them
+      // inside the loop is unsafe since a single instruction may have
+      // multiple destinations that all need to be spilled (like OP_SPLIT).
+      std::tr1::unordered_set<Instruction *> to_del;
+
       for (Value::DefIterator d = lval->defs.begin(); d != lval->defs.end();
            ++d) {
          Value *slot = mem ?
@@ -1576,7 +1582,7 @@ SpillCodeInserter::run(const std::list<ValuePair>& lst)
             d = lval->defs.erase(d);
             --d;
             if (slot->reg.file == FILE_MEMORY_LOCAL)
-               delete_Instruction(func->getProgram(), defi);
+               to_del.insert(defi);
             else
                defi->setDef(0, slot);
          } else {
@@ -1584,6 +1590,9 @@ SpillCodeInserter::run(const std::list<ValuePair>& lst)
          }
       }
 
+      for (std::tr1::unordered_set<Instruction *>::const_iterator it = 
to_del.begin();
+           it != to_del.end(); ++it)
+         delete_Instruction(func->getProgram(), *it);
    }
 
    // TODO: We're not trying to reuse old slots in a potential next iteration.

_______________________________________________
mesa-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-commit

Reply via email to