Hi Boris, On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 09:25, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@collabora.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:32:01 +0200 Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > > On 2019-08-30 7:00 p.m., Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > So, next question is, do you think it's acceptable to pass a > > > DRIcontext here, and if not, do you have any idea how to solve this > > > problem? > > > > Hmm, not sure. Maybe it would be better to explicitly pass in the > > __DRIimage* to which the damage region applies? > > Sorry, for the late reply. I had a look at this proposal and I don't see > how passing a __DRIimage object would help. There's this comment [1] > that makes me think passing a drawable is the right thing to do, but at > the same time I'm not sure how to rework the logic to make it work > without having access to the pipe_context (sounds like an invasive > change to me). > So, I suggest that we revert [2] and [3] until we find a proper > solution to address the problem. > > Daniel, Qiang, are you okay with that?
Yeah, I'm fine with that. I can't remember the details of why passing a DRIimage directly doesn't help. Writing that down somewhere would be good, I think. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
