On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 16:49 +0200, Eric Engestrom wrote: > On Thursday, 2020-05-07 16:26:19 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 16:18 +0200, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > > On Thursday, 2020-05-07 16:07:00 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 09:05 -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > > Looks shiny but.... > > > > > > > > > > We need to be very careful here. One of the big no-nos with > > > > > Khronos > > > > > trademark rules is using logos for things where > > > > > implementations > > > > > aren't > > > > > conformant. Mesa has been living in a mirky in-between land > > > > > for > > > > > a > > > > > while and everything has been mostly fine. We've been very > > > > > careful > > > > > to > > > > > *not* say that Mesa is an implementation of any Khronos APIs. > > > > > Instead, we say that Mesa is an open-source software project > > > > > that > > > > > contains implementations and that some of those > > > > > implementations > > > > > are > > > > > conformant. That page full of logos makes me concerned that > > > > > we're > > > > > going to risk getting into trouble. Khronos marketing cares > > > > > A > > > > > LOT > > > > > about logos. > > > > > > > > As I wrote in the e-mail, I've already clarified the logo-usage > > > > with > > > > Khronos. They are happy with it as-is. > > > > > > Could you post their concerns/guidelines here, so that we can all > > > know > > > what can and cannot be on the website and make sure we never > > > cross > > > the > > > line with future changes? > > > > You can find their logo guidelines here: > > https://www.khronos.org/legal/trademarks/ > > > > But because Mesa is in a special eternal conformant/non-conformant > > limbo, I sent an email to clarify. I've posted the response I got > > here: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/snippets/996 > > > > I think the first link is going to be what most people care about, > > though. > > OK, so basically > - make sure we use the up-to-date, unmodified logos from Khronos > - make sure we are clearly stating that the project is not conformant > as a whole, > but as you said only some "combinations of drivers and APIs" are. > > I think that should be easy enough to not mess up :)
Yeah, I think it's pretty easy to conform to :) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
