-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dave Airlie wrote:
> Also committing any fixes > directly to a stable branch is something I've never really heard of as > a standard. I would assume the expectation is that nobody willing > introduces regressions, but lots of people accidentally do, and it > would be better to find those in master first not in the stable branch > when a distro has already shipped it. This has been the core of my argument against this model since the beginning. One person testing a patch on one configuration does not make it a suitable candidate for a stable branch. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvbOGQACgkQX1gOwKyEAw/A+ACfX4Gu/gwXGA3FM8TRvYOm0B+9 SwQAnA4GqUyYpGVwEJU5PJ1eP4U3kUF0 =8ivH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
