On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 07:36 -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbra...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Since we don't have any progs in mesa that uses glew anymore is it > >> okay if we drop it? I have attached a patch which drops it its a bit > >> big so I packed it. And here is the change thingy: > >> > >> configs/beos | 2 +- > >> configs/darwin | 2 +- > >> configs/default | 4 +- > >> configs/freebsd-dri | 2 +- > >> configs/linux-cell | 2 +- > >> configs/linux-dri-xcb | 2 +- > >> configs/linux-indirect | 2 +- > >> configure.ac | 2 +- > >> include/GL/glew.h |14435 > >> ------------------------------------------------ > >> include/GL/glxew.h | 1476 ----- > >> include/GL/wglew.h | 1247 ----- > >> src/SConscript | 1 - > >> src/glew/LICENSE.txt | 73 - > >> src/glew/Makefile | 54 - > >> src/glew/SConscript | 69 - > >> src/glew/glew.c |14320 > >> ----------------------------------------------- > >> src/glew/glewinfo.c | 8441 ---------------------------- > >> src/glew/visualinfo.c | 1173 ---- > >> 18 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 41299 deletions(-) > > > > This got stuck in the moderation queue, resending without the patch. > > Looks good. > > But it would be handy to have glew in the mesa-demos tree so that we > don't all have find/install the latest version. Any volunteers to do > that?
Indeed, that was the point of having it. I don't see that anything has really changed from that point of view. I don't mind which repo it's in, but I'd like to keep hold of it. Keith _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
