Previously, lower_jumps.cpp only lowered return statements that
appeared inside of an if statement.

Without this patch, lower_jumps.cpp might not lower certain return
statements, causing some back-ends to fail (as in bug #36669).

Fixes unit test test_lower_returns_1.
---
 src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp |   15 +++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp b/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp
index fa247c6..73b5d57 100644
--- a/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp
+++ b/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp
@@ -851,6 +851,21 @@ lower_continue:
        */
       visit_block(&ir->body);
 
+      /* If the body ended in an unconditional return of non-void,
+       * then we don't need to lower it because an unconditional
+       * return of non-void at the end of a function is what returns
+       * get lowered to.
+       *
+       * If the body ended in a return of void, eliminate it because
+       * it is redundant.
+       */
+      if (ir->return_type->is_void() &&
+          get_jump_strength((ir_instruction *) ir->body.get_tail())) {
+         ir_jump *jump = (ir_jump *) ir->body.get_tail();
+         assert (jump->ir_type == ir_type_return);
+         jump->remove();
+      }
+
       if(this->function.return_value)
          ir->body.push_tail(new(ir) ir_return(new (ir) 
ir_dereference_variable(this->function.return_value)));
 
-- 
1.7.5.4

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to