On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 22:07 -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Timothy Arceri
> <timothy.arc...@collabora.com> wrote:
> > ---
> > src/mesa/main/context.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/main/context.h b/src/mesa/main/context.h
> > index 8b64f45..f3d42cb 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/main/context.h
> > +++ b/src/mesa/main/context.h
> > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static inline GLboolean
> > _mesa_has_tessellation(const struct gl_context *ctx)
> > {
> > return ctx->API == API_OPENGL_CORE &&
> > - ctx->Extensions.ARB_tessellation_shader;
> > + (ctx->Version >= 40 || ctx
> > ->Extensions.ARB_tessellation_shader);
>
> Under what circumstances would this matter? If you're faking a GL
> version, probably better not to pass in unexpected shader types to
> the
> driver, no?
>
Well the GL CTS expects to access glPatchParameter* or else it won't
run any tests for 4.0 or above.
Is there any difference in passing the driver unexpected shader types
verse unexpected shader language/features?
> -ilia
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
