> On Mar 23, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Tom Stellard <t...@stellard.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:53:29PM +0000, Rowley, Timothy O wrote:
>> 
>> While that situation would be nice, the swr rasterizer is a subset of an 
>> internal project, and what is upstreamed publicly is not just a straight 
>> copy of our repository.  Moving to having the rasterizer’s “home” to Mesa 
>> involves some large technical and workflow challenges.
> 
> How much testing do you do on the version of swr that's in Mesa?

The internal version undergoes extensive continuous integration testing.  The 
version in Mesa isn’t currently subjected to quite the same testing; we check 
for regressions on the VTK test suite regularly, do targeted testing on our 
major target applications, and currently infrequent piglit runs.

-Tim


_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to