On 16 March 2016 at 10:40, Marek Olšák <[email protected]> wrote: > "offset_after" isn't nasty. :) Yeah, I was inspired by other APIs I > had seen. The sizes make even more sense when they are function > parameters, because the caller can just do: > (sizeof(in), &in, sizeof(out), &out) > A nice list of arguments: - If the majority of people like offset_after, the question "Why barely any projects use it (from a quick search) ?" comes to mind. - I wasn't the only one advocating for versioned interfaces ;-) - They will just work in an identical way and the code will be less. - Regardless of how ugly/nasty/etc, mesa uses versioned interfaces throughout. "Consistency is the key" a wise man have said once. - The interfaces using explicit size argument, that I'm aware of, are not designed with extensibility in mind.
If the above are not enough(independently or together) so make you reconsider, so be it. I won't bother you any more on the topic. Regards, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
