On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Let's let people add themselves to the file if they want. No point in >>> trying to populate it up front. >> >> yeah, I expect people to add themselves, and for the MAINTAINERS file >> to evolve over time.. if people like the idea I'll send a non-rfc >> version of the patch which whatever entries people ask me to add >> themselves for over the next week or so.. mostly just to avoid >> starting off with a completely empty file. But wasn't planning to >> wait for it to be completely populated to start with. > > If you want a bit more to add: > > WAYLAND EGL SUPPORT > R: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> > F: src/egl/wayland/* > F: src/egl/drivers/dri2/platform_wayland.c
So, what is this based on? Maybe I'm not looking in the right place, but out of hundreds of changes in Git touching those files, I see one change from you about six months ago and five changes with a Reviewed-by: tag from you over a year ago. You didn't push any changes other than your own either AFAICT. Looking at all of Mesa yields a similar picture; that is why I previously questioned your authority to NAK patches in Mesa. Don't get me wrong, I'm not questioning your authority on all things Wayland. Your review of Wayland related patches obviously carries a lot of weight. But I'd expect to see a very different footprint in the Git history from somebody who calls himself maintainer. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
