On 05/31/2016 07:10 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 05/29/2016 10:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Another pipe_resource_usage vs pipe_transfer_usage mixup.
CID 1362169, 1362168
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
---
src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_buffer.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_buffer.c
index d91497c..77b35b3 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_buffer.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_buffer.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static void *
svga_buffer_transfer_map(struct pipe_context *pipe,
struct pipe_resource *resource,
unsigned level,
- enum pipe_resource_usage usage,
+ enum pipe_transfer_usage usage,
const struct pipe_box *box,
struct pipe_transfer **ptransfer)
{
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
Actually, maybe that should be reverted to 'unsigned'.
The parameter is actually a bitmask of the PIPE_TRANSFER_x flags. We
define those flags with the pipe_transfer_usage enum type.
But, IIRC, some compilers complain about using enums as bitmasks. I
think this came up in the past but I don't recall the specifics.
I'll post a patch to revert to 'unsigned'.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
