On 16 June 2016 at 21:14, Haixia Shi <h...@chromium.org> wrote: > Emil > > I looked at commit 3689ef32 which started the problem, and it seems that > patch removed the line "touch git_sha1.h.tmp". Previously my workflow was > "working" because the touch command ensures there's always going to be an > empty header file. > > Was this intentional? For the new git_sha1.h rules, I wonder if it is ok to > add a step for git_sha1.h.tmp that does a "touch git_sha1.h" to ensure the > file exists? > As said earlier - if the proposed workflow solutions don't work, please check the earlier suggestions/email [1]. Also [2] might be mildly related (joking of course)
Thanks Emil [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-June/120709.html [2] https://xkcd.com/1172/ _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev