Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
> gcc6 does not like the trick where we point to one entry before the
> array start and then start a while with a pre-increment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_transfer.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_transfer.c
> b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_transfer.c
> index 9ecbcd1..5299b70 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_transfer.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_transfer.c
> @@ -663,8 +663,7 @@ nv30_transfer_rect(struct nv30_context *nv30, enum
> nv30_transfer_filter filter,
> {}
> };
>
> - method = methods - 1;
> - while ((++method)->possible) {
> + for (method = methods; method->possible; method++) {
> if (method->possible(nv30, filter, src, dst)) {
> method->execute(nv30, filter, src, dst);
> return;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
