On 23 August 2016 at 06:14, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com> wrote: >> On 08/22/2016 08:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> >>> From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> >>> >>> Sampler view declarations have return types, but that doesn't work with >>> variable indexing (e.g. SAMP[-1+i]). >>> >>> Adding the return type to the instruction is simpler. >>> >>> All sampler view declaration flags might have to be removed since variable >>> indexing makes them inaccessible. >> >> >> Do you want to get rid of sampler view declarations entirely? > > No, they have their place and I think the sampler view declarations > should stay, but the flags that are attached to them are basically > inaccessible with variable indexing. Since I have no reason to add > array support for sampler view declarations (unlike IN,OUT,TEMP, where > we needed array support due to other reasons), I prefer moving the > flags to instructions.
It should be illegal in all APIs I thought to do mixed arrays. So if you have 1+x, then the bits on 1 should be the same as the bits on all the other sampler views in the array (even though there is no array). Is there a real world problem being solved? Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
