--- Comment #6 from Alejandro PiƱeiro (freenode IRC: apinheiro) 
<> ---
(In reply to Randy from comment #5)
> We can use the patch (in
> to
> workaround the name issue, while some cases still fail due to wrong
> property, like ARRAY_SIZE  

The problem is that the spec is contradictory. The patch on that link (that
btw, the author is Kenneth, that wrote comment 1) fixes some deqp and CTS
tests. But it causes some regressions on others, like you mention below.

So at this point, I really think that it would be better to wait for a
resolution from Khronos on relation to the text of the spec, issue 16 in
particular, and then fix the tests.

> in TargetInterface
> {
>     highp vec4 target[3];
> } targetInstance[2];
> the expected ARRAY_SIZE of[0] is 3, while the actual
> return value is 2.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
mesa-dev mailing list

Reply via email to