On 27 July 2016 at 15:30, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 July 2016 at 01:02, Mauro Rossi <issor.or...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm sending the v2 re-spin of patch as per i965, rechecked twice
>> line-by-line with Tomasz's one.
>> Building ok, marshmallow-x86 booting ok and here are the results of Android
>> CTS egl and gles2 x86 target tests
>> Android CTS 6.0_r7 build:2906653
>> 07-16 00:52:42 I/DeviceManager: Detected new device 192.168.1.7:5555
>> cts-tf > list r
>> Session Pass Fail Not Executed Start time Plan name
>> Device serial(s)
>> 0(EGL) 1410 24 0 2016.07.16_00.21.30 NA
>> 1(GLES2) 13832 82 0 2016.07.16_00.24.23 NA
>> cts-tf >
>> I get the same results as per i965GM
> Thanks Mauro.
> Can we get an ack/nack/r-b from any of the Intel devs ? How do you
> feel on getting this in -stable ?
> FTR the series is identical to the i965 patches by Chad/me/Tomasz
> barring a few s/i915/i965/ style changes.
I've dropped the stable tag, added the above test results and fixed a
few missing 'intel_sync' -> 'intel_gl_sync'.
Thanks Mauro ! Can you please check through the list  and let me
know if anything else is outstanding ?
mesa-dev mailing list