On 12.11.2016 20:34, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Marek Olšák <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]> wrote:
Patches 1, 2, 4 - 6:

Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>

Thanks.


I have one pending LLVM patch related to indirect addressing. Not sure if
that's related to the regressions, but it may be.

LLVM master fixes all but one regression. It's:

[email protected]@execution@variable-indexing@vs-output-array-vec3-index-wr

Nicolai, is that regression OK with you? The decrease in spilling is
worth it. There is no CTS regression. Can I get Rbs for patches 3 & 7?

Yes, I understand the point of patch #3 now, and as for the regression, it might actually be similar to another problem I'm looking at right now. You can add my R-b for 3 & 7 as well.

Nicolai


Thanks,
Marek

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to