On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 November 2016 at 08:32, Tomasz Figa <tf...@chromium.org> wrote: >> It is currently completely broken, as it ends up using RGBX_8888 on >> hardware side, due to no way of distinguishing between these two in the >> DRI API, while HAL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RGB_888 is clearly defined to be the >> 3-byte per pixel RGB format. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tf...@chromium.org> > Nicely spotted ! I wonder if there will be any real benefit in using > the RGB_888. > If so we can extend the DRI loader/driver interface for that (and then > go and fix the drivers). > > Shouldn't platform_surfaceless.c need a similar trick ? > > Regardless: > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
Gentle ping. :) Thanks, Tomasz _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
