On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:47:25 -0600, Brian Paul <brian.e.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote:
> > The non-intel/swrast code is not tested.  I don't have the hardware,
> > now that r300 is gone.
> >
> > One the intel side, there's one regression on the last commit of the
> > series, in gles2 conformance (I wouldn't push that commit until it's
> > fixed).  I haven't tracked it down yet -- I can't even figure out how
> > to see the images from GTF any more.
> 
> Other than the comments I posted, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com>
> 
> I'll see about implementing Map/UnmapRenderbuffer in the gallium state 
> tracker.
> 
> Then, I think we can lift glReadPixels out of swrast and into core
> Mesa.  The Map/Unmap-based glReadPixels shouldn't need anything from
> swrast anymore and we could get rid of some code in the state tracker.

I've been thinking along those lines too.  Sounds good!

Attachment: pgpRnzhhno2e0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to