Bump. Requesting more review please.
On Fri 13 Jan 2017, Chad Versace wrote: > This series depends on fence fd support in I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER2, which > isn't upstream in libdrm nor the kernel yet. I tested this with kmscube > on Skylake, and everything looked good to me. > > I pushed tags for this series as well as all the code I tested with: > > mesa: > http://git.kiwitree.net/cgit/~chadv/mesa/tag/?h=chadv/review/i965-exec-fence-v03 > libdrm: > http://git.kiwitree.net/cgit/~chadv/libdrm/tag/?h=chadv/review/intel-exec-fence-v01 > linux: > http://git.kiwitree.net/cgit/~chadv/linux/tag/?h=chadv/test/i915-exec-fence-v03 > kmscube: > http://git.kiwitree.net/cgit/~chadv/kmscube/tag/?h=chadv/test/fences-v02 > > I submitted the libdrm patches to the intel-gfx list. Someone else > should submit the kernel patches, as I tested them but don't grok them. > > Chad Versace (7): > i965: Add intel_screen::has_fence_fd > i965: Add intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence() > i965/sync: Add brw_fence::type > i965/sync: Fail sync creation when batchbuffer flush fails > i965/sync: Rename brw_fence_insert() > WAIT: configure: Bump libdrm requirement to 2.4.XX > i965/sync: Implement fences based on Linux sync_file > > configure.ac | 3 +- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_sync.c | 293 > ++++++++++++++++++++++---- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 24 ++- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h | 14 +- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c | 3 + > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.h | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.11.0.21.ga274e0a > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
