On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Nothing uses this yet but it serves as a nice bit of documentation
>> > that's relatively easy to find.
>> > ---
>> >  src/intel/isl/isl.h        |  2 ++
>> >  src/intel/isl/isl_format.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl.h b/src/intel/isl/isl.h
>> > index bdc5ebf..47e4a1e 100644
>> > --- a/src/intel/isl/isl.h
>> > +++ b/src/intel/isl/isl.h
>> > @@ -1040,6 +1040,8 @@ bool isl_format_supports_filtering(const struct
>> > gen_device_info *devinfo,
>> >                                     enum isl_format format);
>> >  bool isl_format_supports_vertex_fetch(const struct gen_device_info
>> > *devinfo,
>> >                                        enum isl_format format);
>> > +bool isl_format_supports_ccs_d(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
>> > +                               enum isl_format format);
>> >  bool isl_format_supports_ccs_e(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
>> >                                 enum isl_format format);
>> >  bool isl_format_supports_multisampling(const struct gen_device_info
>> > *devinfo,
>> > diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl_format.c b/src/intel/isl/isl_format.c
>> > index ebc8ec9..2705595 100644
>> > --- a/src/intel/isl/isl_format.c
>> > +++ b/src/intel/isl/isl_format.c
>> > @@ -437,6 +437,21 @@ isl_format_supports_vertex_fetch(const struct
>> > gen_device_info *devinfo,
>> >     return format_gen(devinfo) >= format_info[format].input_vb;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +/**
>> > + * Returns true if the given format can support single-sample fast
>> > clears.
>> > + */
>> > +bool
>> > +isl_format_supports_ccs_d(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
>> > +                          enum isl_format format)
>> > +{
>> > +   if (!isl_format_supports_rendering(devinfo, format))
>> > +      return false;
>> > +
>> Add a check for non-MSRT?
>
>
> Maybe?  There are other things we could potentially check for such as tiling
> format, num samples, etc. in order to get a full "can this support
> fast-clears" check.  I intended this to be just a format check.  Thoughts?
>
I'm fine with leaving it as it is with an added comment saying:
It just checks for format. We need additional checks like tiling format,
num samples to determine if this can support fast clears.

As you're already here, you might want to add another helper to cover all
the checks. I'll leave it up to you.
>>
>> > +   const struct isl_format_layout *fmtl =
>> > isl_format_get_layout(format);
>> > +
>> > +   return fmtl->bpb == 32 || fmtl->bpb == 64 || fmtl->bpb == 128;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> >  bool
>> >  isl_format_supports_ccs_e(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
>> >                            enum isl_format format)
>> > --
>> > 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mesa-dev mailing list
>> > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to