On 7 February 2017 at 16:11, Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]> wrote: > How does it make any sense to declare const on the return type of a function > that doesn't return a pointer??? It's not returning by reference, it's > returning a copy so const on the return type of the function means nothing. > Seems like you missed a similar nitpick in commit edf3113aeddcf66cb24906e53a2d4f41616f8985 Dropping the const from get_px_size_sa() or adding one here will both make the compiler happy.
Let me know what you prefer - I'm fine either way. Thanks Emil P.S. Can I interest you in using plain text emails ;-) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
