On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello list, > > The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have: > - 60 queued > - 9 nominated (outstanding) > - and 0 rejected patch(es) > > > The current queue consists of: > > On the GLX/EGL front we have a GLVND fix for "The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth" > and other games, eglQuerySurface now returns correct geometry when running > under X11/DRI3. > > There's a number of crash fixes affecting all Gallium drivers. An old > regression fix for r300 on BE hardware been fixed. The radeonsi driver has > fixes for Tessellation shaders on Carrizo and Stoney hardware. > > While on the nouveau side, compute shader have been improved on some > nvc0 devices. > > The vc4 and etnaviv drivers have also seen a couple of small fixe. > > For the Intel drivers (both GL and Vulkan) we have a diverse bunch of patches > - > from CTS fixes for Sandy Bridge, to improved swizzle clears and improved > handling of GPUs without (Last Level Cache) LLC. > > On integration side - we had some Android build fixes and a new script to > parse and look for bug fixes. > > > And for those of you wondering - the delay was caused by a buggy optimisation > pass, that has since been removed. > > > Take a look at section "Mesa stable queue" for more information. > > > Testing reports/general approval > -------------------------------- > Any testing reports (or general approval of the state of the branch) will be > greatly appreciated. > > The plan is to have 17.0.1 this Friday (3th of March), around or shortly > after 19:00 GMT. > > If you have any questions or suggestions - be that about the current patch > queue or otherwise, please go ahead. > > > Trivial merge conflicts > ----------------------- > commit 9c80a8133f8e75d95bad54bae92402fa7a7252e0 > Author: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> > > radeonsi: fix UNSIGNED_BYTE index buffer fallback with non-zero start (v2) > > (cherry picked from commit a264fee6245856340fab9024e1a428626e966335) > > > Marek, the above commit seems to imply > 791e8ce04a7e9970f437858bdff0a1f8b47626ba. > Can you please let me know if we should pick the latter as well ?
No, it's not necessary and it wouldn't compile, because that depends on yet another patch. Marek _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
