From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
We could store these in the device, but it's probably
not that much overhead to recalculate them, this is needed
because we will emit the rings if the queue has them created
so we need to emit the register values correctly as well.
This fixes some tess tests failing when run after other tests
inside CTS.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 14 +++++---------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
index af82926..5c48be1 100644
--- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
+++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
@@ -1393,15 +1393,11 @@ radv_get_preamble_cs(struct radv_queue *queue,
if (needs_tess_rings)
add_tess_rings = true;
}
-
- if (add_tess_rings) {
- tess_factor_ring_size = 32768 *
queue->device->physical_device->rad_info.max_se;
- hs_offchip_param = radv_get_hs_offchip_param(queue->device,
-
&max_offchip_buffers);
- tess_offchip_ring_size = max_offchip_buffers *
- queue->device->tess_offchip_block_dw_size * 4;
-
- }
+ tess_factor_ring_size = 32768 *
queue->device->physical_device->rad_info.max_se;
+ hs_offchip_param = radv_get_hs_offchip_param(queue->device,
+ &max_offchip_buffers);
+ tess_offchip_ring_size = max_offchip_buffers *
+ queue->device->tess_offchip_block_dw_size * 4;
if (scratch_size <= queue->scratch_size &&
compute_scratch_size <= queue->compute_scratch_size &&
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
