From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> We could store these in the device, but it's probably not that much overhead to recalculate them, this is needed because we will emit the rings if the queue has them created so we need to emit the register values correctly as well.
This fixes some tess tests failing when run after other tests inside CTS. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> --- src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c index af82926..5c48be1 100644 --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c @@ -1393,15 +1393,11 @@ radv_get_preamble_cs(struct radv_queue *queue, if (needs_tess_rings) add_tess_rings = true; } - - if (add_tess_rings) { - tess_factor_ring_size = 32768 * queue->device->physical_device->rad_info.max_se; - hs_offchip_param = radv_get_hs_offchip_param(queue->device, - &max_offchip_buffers); - tess_offchip_ring_size = max_offchip_buffers * - queue->device->tess_offchip_block_dw_size * 4; - - } + tess_factor_ring_size = 32768 * queue->device->physical_device->rad_info.max_se; + hs_offchip_param = radv_get_hs_offchip_param(queue->device, + &max_offchip_buffers); + tess_offchip_ring_size = max_offchip_buffers * + queue->device->tess_offchip_block_dw_size * 4; if (scratch_size <= queue->scratch_size && compute_scratch_size <= queue->compute_scratch_size && -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
