On 26.04.2017 12:16, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 26/04/17 20:14, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 26/04/17 19:50, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 26/04/17 17:28, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 26.04.2017 04:45, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com>
On 24/04/17 20:35, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
The spec doesn't clearly state this, but I have got clarifiation
from the spec authors.
Okay, that answers my question from the other email.
BTW, what about samplers? It seems that this code doesn't check for
samplers at all?
That's because this is one of those places where OpenGL is totally
inconsistent. Samplers were already allowed, this was a really pain
for implementing indirect indexing, especially when throwing AoA into
the mix.
Samuel it would be really good to have some piglit tests for images.
e.g. Arrays of structs with arrays of images, etc. There should be
some examples in the ARB_gpu_shader5 and ARB_arrays_of_arrays
execution piglit tests.
Anyway, this patch:
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haeh...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
---
src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
index a63f9da912..5ef99bf504 100644
--- a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
+++ b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
@@ -6944,7 +6944,7 @@
ast_process_struct_or_iface_block_members(exec_list *instructions,
_mesa_glsl_error(&loc, state, "atomic counter in
structure");
}
- if (decl_type->contains_image()) {
+ if (!state->has_bindless() &&
decl_type->contains_image()) {
/* FINISHME: Same problem as with atomic counters.
* FINISHME: Request clarification from Khronos and add
* FINISHME: spec quotation here.
I believe there was a spec bug filed for this (maybe internally). We
should probably check if that has been resolved. If so we might just
have to remove this check completely.
From what I recall there was a spec bug where the outcome said
samplers in structs were allowed and atomics were not. This is what
the FINISHME is talking about. Currently the spec doesn't say images
are not allowed.
I should clarify that this outcome was decided in a separate bug report
from images.
Which bug report was this?
Cheers,
Nicolai
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
