On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:02:56 +0800, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan....@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:25:55AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > > As far as I > > can see, it should be possible to store the DO/WHILE/BRK/CONT > > information in struct brw_compile so that the only long-lived > > brw_instruction * pointers other than p->store go away. > > I may not get your idea. But I thought: since we are going to store the > instruction index in the if_stack and loop_stack, it would be simple if > we let brw_DO to return the instruction index. Thus I made several new > patches yesterday(and already sent out). Please help to review it.
I've posted the alternate patch series I was intending. It should reduce how much is needed in the series you've been working on. I do need to test the pre-gen6 code, will do that now.
pgpJcm1pf5oEI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
