> On May 18, 2017, at 22:46, Marek Olšák <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Marek Olšák <[email protected]> > > so that LLVM doesn't allocate SGPRs where XNACK is. > > Cc: 17.1 <[email protected]>
You shouldn’t be explicitly enabling xnack. This sounds like a workaround for a backend bug, and this has other consequences than changing the reserved registers. Do you have an example of where this is a problem? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
