On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The "ac" functions could also be forked and put into r600 if people > > want to preserve the OpenCL support. That would remove the dependency > > on "ac". > >
I thought amdgpu.a was supposed to be shared by both, is there a way to split off the GCN parts and still have reuse shared code? I won't hide it, my intention is to rely on shared code as much as possible and force others to care (same strategy with LLVM, but mesa does not have a nice regression test suite). > Any objections if we defer this to the person working on r600+OpenCL, > or is that a must for the series? > I'm slightly worried that a "fix the build" is going into "refactor > driver X" :-\ what's wrong with adding an r600g+opencl on radeonsi dependency? if it's "not used" enough to be removed, then it should be "not used" enough to have non-standard dependency. regards, Jan > > -Emil
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
