Hi Daniel, On 8 June 2017 at 19:43, Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> wrote: > Hi, > With full support for modifiers in DRIimage, this patch series adds > support for fully plumbing them through X11. A patchset proposing > an extension to DRI3 to support multiple planes and modifiers can > be found here: > https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2017-June/053854.html > > The Git trees, all of which are using the wip/2017-05/dri3-v1.1 branch, > can be found here: > > git://git.collabora.com/git/user/daniels/xcb-proto > - contains support for lists of FDs, as well as the protocol itself > git://git.collabora.com/git/user/daniels/libxcb > - support for lists of FDs > git://git.collabora.com/git/user/daniels/dri3proto > - what it says on the box > git://git.collabora.com/git/user/daniels/mesa > - this patchset, as well as the previous to enable modifier > import/queries on i965: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2017-June/158092.html > git://git.collabora.com/git/user/daniels/xserver > - X server support (note: has rough edges) > Since exact implementation details [on Mesa size] can take a while, I'm thinking whether prioritising and merging the protocol changes won't be a good idea.
By doing so, one can roll releases of said components, making it will be easier for those to reach the build/test servers. As a nice 'side-effect' we can/should bump the required version and drop the ifdef guards through the codebase - be that Mesa or Xserver. This way we'll have an early, explicit, error if the build/test machine is not updated. As otherwise one will build X/Mesa w/o DRi3 1.1 support and waste time debugging why ;-) -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
