On Tuesday, 2017-06-20 09:56:25 -0700, Chad Versace wrote: > On Tue 20 Jun 2017, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > I'm not sure why avoiding drmIoctl is even a thing, there are plenty > > of huge optimisation opportunities, this just seems like a feel good > > pointless microptimisation. > > There is very little usage of libdrm remaining in i965. If the last bit > were dropped, then I believe Chromium OS would no longer have to > maintain an Android-fork of libdrm for its Android container.
Why the fork? Are the changes incompatible with upstream libdrm? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
