Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: > So the version is FOOgit-$SHA while the DSO uses, FOOsvn. At the same > time at least 3.9.0/3.9.1 has broken llvm-config --libnames/libfiles, > so we cannot rely on that. > Doesn't seem like LLVM is giving us something robust to work with here. > > LLVM users/devs (Rafael), I would suggest up-streaming a patch which > changes that toggle default value, for now. > As LLVM does a few releases where it has a reliable way of determining > the library name users can switch to it. > > How does this sound?
I am not sure I understand why having the hash in the version causes problems. Can you send an email to llvm-...@lists.llvm.org about it? Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
